Innova vs Hahnemuehle vs Canson - Inkjet Paper Musings
A brief look at the new Innova Fine Art Photo inkjet papers, and how
they rate compared to the Hahnemuehle and Canson/Arches papers.
Article By Jeremy Daalder of Image Science, Australia, and reproduced by kind permission
Jeremy can be reached at www.imagescience.com.au
OPUSalbums observation: Jeremy's
comany sells three products and is able to be objective on all three.
We sell only one, but we believe commercially and technically Innova
has the edge on the balance of product range, product quality, customer
service and value for money. However we are quite happy to show his
ratings of each so that you may make a more informed judgment.
We've tested the new Innova paper range more extensively over the past few months and come up with some interesting results.
All these tests are based off an Epson 2100, using Gretag Macbeth spectrophotometry equipment and software. Results may very well vary with different printers,
but we expect these results are representative for all Epson's Pigment
ink based printers (R800, R1800, 2100/2200, 4000, 7600, 9600). We have
not yet extensively tested the papers with dye based printers, however
long experience with these sorts of papers has lead us to believe our
results will also follow through to dye based printers.
Firstly, we've only looked in detail so far at Innova's 'Photo'
range - their 'Fine Art' range is equally interesting, perhaps more so.
We've found the Photo range to be technically excellent, but perhaps
(and this is of course a very subjective opinion), a little lifeless.
Funnily enough, of the papers in the Photo range, we've found the
Smooth Cotton Natural White (SCNW) to have measurably superior image
reproduction to the Smooth Cotton High White and the Fiba Print. All
the papers and coatings are excellent, but we've found SCNW to be the
very best. Oddly, we have been able to achieve more saturated blues and
reds in particular with SCNW, as well as better shadow detail. This is
perhaps counter to expectations, but we believe the optical brighteners
in FibaPrint an SCHW are impairng their image reproduction a fraction
for the sake of really bright whites. Given the Natural White is
visibly only a fraction less white than the High White, there really
seems little point to the High White paper.
deserves a special mention though - it's the closest thing we've found
to Epson Archival Matte in many ways (although it is more expensive -
but we think worth it). It has a very bright white, extremely
smooth surface. It's a much better weight than EAM (280 versus 180), so
if you're after a really smooth surfaced fine art paper, it's a great
choice. EAM is still a better proofing paper though, given its very low
cost, but its reputation for yellowing (Epson can't even sell this
paper branded as 'archival' in many other countries), means it isn't a
great choice for selling your work.
Hahnemuehle Photo Rag 308 remains the best inkjet paper in the world for our money (literally, we use tonnes of the stuff!). However, Innova Smooth Cotton Natural White is
the closest a paper has ever come to knocking HMPR off its perch. In
many ways, the results on these two papers are uncannily similar - not
a surprise as apparently Innova is run by some people who used to be
- The Innova Paper has a smoother surface, less prone to flaking. It really is very, very smooth. This means it will be particularly interesting to roll paper users, a few of whom have reported minor problems with surface coating flaking with Photo Rag.
Rag is a cleaner, brighter white - placed side by side the SCNW is a
little warmer and murky looking in comparison. Viewed on its own though
it is still quite a bright white.
- Gamut of the two papers
is remarkably similar - I'd say Photo Rag is a fraction better still
with very saturated colours, but this may well be down to the
brightness of the surface just giving the paper that much more 'pop'
- Shadow detail is also very similar, I can't see or measure any perceptible difference
- Sharpness is a hair better with the Innova, due to the smoother surface.
Innova Paper is a little lifeless in comparison - image reproduction is
excellent, faultless really, but the paper itself doesn't really bring
anything to the final product. Photo Rag just exudes that little extra
bit of quality in its texture, weight, and feel. It's definitely more
'Fine Art' than the Innova paper, which is more traditionally
photographic in its smooth, slick look. But to my mind, that is what
make Photo Rag so special - it's perfect balance between fine art paper
qualities and fantastic image reproduction with both dye and pigment
inks. Of course some would disagree and actually prefer the more
clinical look of the Innova Papers.
The Canson Papers offer interesting alternatives to both Hahnemuehle and Innova. Firstly, their canvas
is just top notch, easily the best inkjet canvas we've found and a
really great product - thoroughly recommended. When it comes to their
papers, both PhotoGloss and PhotoSatin
are excellent, traditional photographic (i.e. gloss or semi-gloss =
pearl = 'matte') papers that we feel are as good as, in fact better,
than anything we've tried from Illford, Kodak, and certainly Epson.
They're both very classy photographic style papers, perfect for the
wedding and portrait markets for example.
Where Canson really shine are there true fine art papers for
reproductions of painting, watercolours and the like. In most cases,
they offer the same actual papers as in their watercolour paper ranges,
just with an inkjet coating of excellent coatings. This has allowed us,
and many of our clients, to reproduce artworks with an almost
frightening level of accuracy. When done well, with good colour
management, the results can be so similar that from more than a few
centimetres away, it is quite simply impossible to pick the original
from the reproduction!
Hahnemuehle of course also have numerous papers suitable for fine
art reproduction, or simply to add more texture to your Photographic
work. William Turner and Torchon are lovely papers, in particular, but the whole range is excellent. Well worth a sample pack if you haven't tried it yet.
Unfortunately, the Canson approach to paper availability is a bit hit and miss. You'll have to check this page
to see if your required paper is available in a size to suit
you...there are some big and odd gaps in the collection, but the range
is relatively new and we hope to see it expand in time.
I run Image Science
- so I sell all of these papers. I don't make much money from them
really, but I do make a little. I started selling these papers because
I use them and other photographers expressed interest. This has grown
to Image Science becoming one of the leading and more progressive
suppliers of interesting fine art papers in Australia. So feel free to
consider these musings biased, if that makes you happy. We would always
encourage you to do your own tests. Having said that, I'm a member of
the AIPP - through that, and Image Science, I see lots of top quality
work all the time - work printed to the highest levels, by Australia's
best photographers. I spend a LOT of time making sure my own print
quality is right up there with the best. So when it comes to print
quality, I do think I'm a good judge. It's totally up to you to decide
whether you agree.